|
The purpose of this FAQ is to provide answers to questions commonly asked within the filking community. I've been a member of the filking community for about 25 years now as both a listener and a performer, and hope that the info provided here will be of use to new filkers as well as those curious about this whole "filk" thing. Many thanks to those who have contributed. Please note that my opinions may not reflect those of other filkers. This FAQ should *not* be regarded as being definitive, but only as a rough guide; I will be updating info over time. Wherever possible, I have also included links to other sources of related information. Unfortunately I've had to turn off commenting because of spammers but plan to reinstate commenting once I've switched over to Wordpress on the new server. Also see Kay Shapero's rec.music.filk Filk FAQ.- Debbie
The Filk FAQ is moving to Filking.net/filkfaq/! Please adjust your bookmarks, thanks. |
|
QUESTION: Respondents unanimously agreed that spoken word pieces are fine in an open filk circle. From Phil Parker: "With regard to spoken word pieces, I have never seen a spoken word piece that was well written, well chosen for the moment, and well recited or told fail to get a good reaction from a filk circle." Advice included the following: - Most seemed to agree that YOU SHOULD KEEP YOUR SPOKEN WORD PIECE SHORT. From Gary Ehrlich: "I have no problem with spoken-word performances. We have some excellent storytellers in the community: Mark Bernstein, Harold Feld, Ian Hanley are the ones who come immediately to mind. As folks have said, the timing is key, especially in a typical circle; I'd say keep it to around 5 minutes (similar for songs). Longer is fine for concerts or smaller circles where folks might be willing to listen to a longer piece. I still recall with horror one story told in a circle that went so long I was able to go to the bathroom, hit the con suite, check out the alternate room, come back, pack my stuff up, and **move** to the alternate room...and the story was still going when I left with my last load of gear..." From Harold: "Given that people come to circles to perform as well as to listen, it is polite to make sure your own material does not run overlong. Time yourself when practicing. Don't rush the performance, but you personally should know whether you will be taking 5 minutes, 10 minutes or possibly more and judge whether the audience is really in the mood for such a long piece." - Practice. A LOT. From Justin Eiler: "Like musical performance, spoken word performance is just that--a performance. Therefore, it requires practice. Memorizing your performance is a necessity, but practice also helps with tempo and timing, delivery, and style." - There were mixed opinions about whether memorization was necessary or not. Most seemed to feel that memorizing isn't necessary as long as you give an entertaining performance (i.e. don't just read in a monotone with your face glued to your piece of paper). "I disagree slightly re memorization being a necessity, just as you don't have to completely memorize every song you perform," says Joe Keshlam. "Doing so is definitely advantageous, because it frees you from having to spend attention on keeping track of where you are, avoids misreading errors, and lets you focus on the audience (which can be really useful). But if you need a lectern/music-stand in front of you, that's fine too -- just remember to deliver the piece to the audience, not to the paper, and try not to be *completely* dependent upon the printed page." - Do a lot of prep. Practice (yes, again!) and study the material carefully. From Joe Keshlam: "Performance thought: Even prose is not _unstructured_ text. I'm not sure I could really claim there's a rhythm to it, but there's generally some clear sense of the author's style and the characters' personalities... and if you can develop an ear for those, it actually helps you memorize the material. It's a method-acting sort of thing; once you have a sense of how the character or narrator speaks, it's easier to remember exactly what they actually said." - Put emotion into your performance. "Get into the emotion of whatever story you're telling," says vixyish in LJ. "It's all about the emotion, whatever that emotion is. That's going to be the thing that hooks your audience, above all else." - From surrdave in LJ: "A bit of acting goes a long way with spoken word--specifically, using gestures and posture to intensify, interpret, or simply attract visual focus. I'd say at the least stand up to do the spoken piece, which helps get the attention in a chaos circle anyway. It's easy to leap from song to patter to talkin' blues to storytelling with musical interludes to plain ol' storytelling; the key is to maintain the fundamentals of rhythm, pitch variation, dynamics, enunciation... and passion." - Consider adding musical accompaniment during your recitation. From Paul Bristow: "UK filkcons have also featured storytelling with harp accompaniment - although I think a vital lesson here is to keep it brief, given that some of your audience just won't be into story telling and will get fidgetty. (Of course, an over-long self-indulgent saga is still an over-long self-indulgent saga, whether it is sung to a tune or not.)" - Consider taking a public speaking course, or at least listen to some well-known performers who use the spoken word effectively. From Jim Poltrone: "One of my favorite orators is the late Shel Silverstein. Listen to him read "Someone Ate The Baby" or "The Smoke-Off". There's vocal variety (pitch, volume, cadence, even character voices), descriptive words (I can see pictures in my mind when he speaks), and enthusiasm. Christine Lavin is another performer who often reads prose or poetry during her concerts, and some have been featured on her albums. Listen to these and other spoken-word performers, and try to imitate them. Or better yet, develop your own style. And one more thing: No. Shatner. Impressions. Please! :-)" Any suggestions appreciated; please post them using the comment form at the bottom of this page. Also see the responses to this Dandelion Report LJ entry.
Spoken word performances can work very well at open filks, provided that the speaker takes the necessary preparations: Like musical performance, spoken word performance is just that--a performance. Therefore, it requires practice. Memorizing your performance is a necessity, but practice also helps with tempo and timing, delivery, and style. Justin Posted by: Justin Eiler at August 25, 2004 06:11 PMI agree with Justin that performance is performance and benefits from rehearsal. You *can* wing a piece, just as you can take a stab at a song that's outside your normal repertoire... but you'll never do it as well as one which you've spent time polishing -- finding the voices and characters, finding the rhythms of the piece, deciding how to say each line so it rings naturally, and simply getting it "grooved" so you don't stumble over it. I disagree slightly re memorization being a necessity... just as you don't have to completely memorize every song you perform. Doing so is definitely advantageous, because it frees you from having to spend attention on keeping track of where you are, avoids misreading errors, and lets you focus on the audience (which can be really useful). But if you need a lectern/music-stand in front of you, that's fine too -- just remember to deliver the piece to the audience, not to the paper, and try not to be *completely* dependent upon the printed page. If you're preparing a new piece, be aware that two single-spaced typewritten pages will run about five minutes of performance... in other words, about equivalent to one longish song. Put in those terms, memorizing -- even if you're a stickler for word-for-word performance -- may not be so scary an idea. That also gives you a handle on how much rehearsal time you may need to put in before it's really where you want it to be. (Flipping it around the other way, this means that a typical short story is probably going to approach an hour's performance. I've got a piece of that sort filed in long-term wetware, but I doubt I'm ever going to find a good venue for performing it live.) Performance thought: Even prose is not _unstructured_ text. I'm not sure I could really claim there's a rhythm to it, but there's generally some clear sense of the author's style and the characters' personalities... and if you can develop an ear for those, it actually helps you memorize the material. It's a method-acting sort of thing; once you have a sense of how the character or narrator speaks, it's easier to remember exactly what they actually said. Actually, that word "acting" is one worth thinking about... and not just for spoken-word pieces; it can apply to songs as well. These are all story-telling arts, and there are many ways to strengthen the story's impact -- from things as simple as letting the speaker's emotions show on your face (and be heard in your voice) to adjusting tempo/timing to emphasize key phrases... all the way up to doing multiple voices and accents and so on. You don't *have* to do all this, just as you don't *have* to do a fully-arranged (or fully-orchestrated?) performance of a song... but it can be fun to try, and if you succeed it's fun to watch and listen to. Go for it. As with singing, practice makes better. Posted by: Keshlam at August 25, 2004 08:09 PMI am a fan of spoken word performance, having done several of my own. I think many of the rules that apply to song perfomance apply to spoken word. I do have one warning- time yourself! The average spoken word story is longer than the average song. In regular storytelling circles, a standard "open mike" is 8 minutes, and a 10-15 minute piece at a story swap is acceptable. By contrast, the average song is shorter and usually has a chorus. Given that people come to circles to perform as well as to listen, it is polite to make sure your own material does not run overlong. Time yourself when practicing. Don't rush the performance, but you personally should know whether you will be taking 5 minutes, 10 minutes or possibly more and judge whether the audience is really in the mood for such a long piece. Posted by: Harold at August 26, 2004 10:41 AMMany years ago I was telling a story at a filk and someone thought that I was taking too long and they dumped a glass of water on my head. Now that person went on to be my wife….. but that is another story. But generally speaking, any story or poem that is longer than the average song is a bad idea. Posted by: Eric Gerds at August 26, 2004 12:19 PMI have no problem with spoken-word performances. We have some excellent storytellers in the community: Mark Bernstein, Harold Feld, Ian Hanley are the ones who come immediately to mind. As folks have said, the timing is key, especially in a typical circle; I'd say keep it to around 5 minutes (similar for songs). Longer is fine for concerts or smaller circles where folks might be willing to listen to a longer piece. I still recall with horror one story told in a circle that went so long I was able to go to the bathroom, hit the con suite, check out the alternate room, come back, pack my stuff up, and **move** to the alternate room...and the story was still going when I left with my last load of gear... Posted by: Gary Ehrlich at August 26, 2004 08:55 PM
Base URL: http://www.filking.net All postings, columns, articles and artwork belong to their respective authors. Everything else ©copyright 2007 Debbie Ridpath Ohi. Reproduction and/or distribution of the whole or any part in any form is forbidden unless prior permission has been granted. |